mark22
-
Posts
53 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by mark22
-
-
1 hour ago, carina007 said:
KORDA choker of the month.
6:4 5:2 and match point
6:4 *5:3 and 30:0
6:4 5:4 and match point
and he managed to lose all that.
Incredible. Sometimes i really hate tennis and betting
had a bet on Korda vs. Norrie in Delray Beach (18.02.) and watched the match. Korda had everything under control in 3rd set, 5:4 and serve for the win.. He got last service games by ease, the got broken like noob.. later he lost 7:4 in TB. this one is even worse
-
My point of view on today´s finals. Last few days were not that good as previous weeks, so just an accumulator today. Anyway, i watched some matches and highlights so feeling is good.
FAA - Rublev 1 @1.63
Rematch from Amsterdam 8 days ago. Felix continues his journey to 2nd title in two weeks. If you look at the scoreline, he could win there even 2:0. He is more reliable than Rublev, who lost sets in every match here in Marseille. I think this will be crucial today - consistency. Rublev can take sets from any player on ATP tour, but Felix will play smart and take every UE from him, so Rublev will have to risk everything and this can end up fast. FFA had very though opponent in semifinal - Safiulin, who played a great tournament.
Draper - van Rijthoven over 21.5 games @1.63
Challenger Forli is played on hard indoor surface. van Rijthoven is my common ´´customer´´ on that type of bets. He can play tiebreaks with low quality players, but at the same time he is very dangerous for most of average players on hard courts. He is even favourite today, but I wouldn´t underestimate Draper, who showed his skills on main tournaments and won this one about month ago. Both players have high ace rate, and this odds for 21.5 games limit is a must bet.
Norrie - Opelka over 22.5 games @1.56
Opelka amazed me in this two weeks. If he wasn´t playing with Milmann 3 hours I would definitely take him as a winner here. He had long matches here and fatigue can be a factor. Still he is pretty much unbreakable on his serve and Norrie shouldn˝t be favourite here. I watched his match against Korda, who outplayed him in 2nd and end of 3rd set. He had service for the match but then by some strange errors he throw it all away. Bad match from both players. Norrie raised his form in last weeks, we have to admit that. I expect some easier service holds for both players and at least one tiebreak.
Alcaraz - Schwartzman 1 @1.37
I had a bet on Ruud in last weeks final, where Schwartzman even took first set, but then Ruud completely demolished him in 3rd set. When I thought he recovered well and he will take a walk to title this week, he already had big troubles on this way - Cerundolo and Andujar. I´m wondering what can he even do against Alcaraz, who is playing outstanding in Rio. Berettini and Fognini are his last trophies and you can´t imagine much tougher challenge on clay than this 2 Italians. His game is full of winners and good service performance, so I thinf Schwartzman will have very hard job to be competitive, since he has no real weapons at the moment.
- Torque, CzechPunter and Simeon Borisof
-
3
-
10 hours ago, Foo_Fighter said:
Well I'm happy I invested in Riley Opelka. He prevailed in two long, grueling sets. He's a nice dude ?
Opelka is much faster than Isner, had better backhand and almost 45% ace rate! This is insane.. Isner had his chances in TB, but lost it by stupid mistakes, which Opelka didn't do. So for me completely deserved win for younger American.
Now I watched also Brooksby highlights, he played for almost 3 hours, saving MP.. he got it in the end. Now he has much less recovery time than Opelka. He beat him in Antwerp (simillar conditions), where Opelka didn't have single BP. I think the same can happen to Brooksby today, Opelka should get more aces here. Brooksby plays good against tall players. Hard to predict, but i would say over 25.5 games and Opelka to win.
- Foo_Fighter and CzechPunter
-
2
-
43 minutes ago, Foo_Fighter said:
John or Riley? Who you got?
when i saw 25.5 games line this was a banker, but my bookie offered only 26.5 which is automatically line to not play as you need 3 sets
also in play offer was bad (TB only @1.40). Opelka looks better in long points, but he also had some lucky shots in TB of set 1. Let see how second one finishes. I˝m rather watching Sonego:Schwartzman, Italian made great comeback!
-
after watching some highlights and stats Azarenka looks very good here, Sakkari seems in better shape and especially quicker around the court than Pegula.. Berettini´s bombs will be too much to handle for PCB i think, he had a day off so I hope he recovered well. It will be interesting to see where he can reach now when there is no Djokovic who stopped him regulary on GS last year
Doubles side: Kokkinakis/Kyrgios seems to have a lot of chemistry and won against Mektic/Pavic was no coincidence. Their serve stats was great (17 aces) and Behar/Escobar are not heavier oponents at all, they should advance in front of home crowd.
-
On 1/21/2022 at 9:39 AM, raduvlad1995 said:
wow didn t think people here were this douchey...I literaly started betting on 4th january this year solely on tennis cause it's my bread and butter with 200 euros, I made 1600 euros solely betting on every result that seemed likely to happen no matter the odd. Good luck chasing huge odds and loosing time and time again.
I never said winning on low odds is not possible. But every experienced betting player knows that sometimes is @1.80 bet more reliable than some @1.30. If you get accumulator of 3 bets with that odds you have 2.2 or 5.8 odds ticket. Probability that one will go wrong is almost the same on each ticket! Now you can calculate profit from both bet triple and see where I´m pointing.. Sure you can have luck, I had it too sometimes.. but don´t worry it will pass
when you´ll start losing you will lost all profit and more. And then you will start thinking why the hell low odds don´t make you money despite you´re winning tickets. It´s about finding bookmakers wrong odds or lines and earn on them because of your knowledge, not finding the best @1.10 winner! And that is what this forum should be about..
-
1 hour ago, CzechPunter said:
He started with bad talk.. i have a right to comment his betting, like he comments most of everyone´s else posts with no need. Of course I don´t place his bets, don´t worry
but I´m saying he makes thread messed up for anyone looking for QUALITY tips and opinions! When there is GS going on, everyone like him is smart as ´´f***´´ about tennis, when there are challengers etc. there is few posts. Why? Because they know only top 50 players everyone can write essays about Federer and Nadal..
- CzechPunter, lelit and raduvlad1995
-
1
-
2
-
15 minutes ago, neilovan said:
Lol, what have you contributed here exactly? I'm sure you are a big winner. Looks like I'll prob be fine on my second bet. DO you have anything positive to add to the forum?
Even with a loss today I am still 10 for my last 12 bets. So squarish or a little up.
Crawl back into your hole...
Second, fifth, tenth bet in a day who cares then? give ONE bet that will be winner. @CzechPunter should be an example to everyone writing something here and I contribute posts like he does, when I do. I see you´re also nonstop editing your posts
no one does it since it´s really necessary.. Doesn´t matter what you calculate, if someone follows you blindly this week he would already lose everything. Betting on 5-10 pairs with odds 1.70 is just gambling, and anyone who does this can´t go in with low stake.. And as I can see I´m not the only one bothered with your posts.
-
1 hour ago, neilovan said:
What an excellent start to the day
Cornet beating Muguruza and Schwartzman losing to O' Connell. Only good thing is I got them both in the same bet.
hahaha, what a suprise huh? with you rude answer when I just told my opinion on your strategy, what will you say now? you´re gonna have a lot of stress days with your betting
writing 100 posts with your ´´analysis´´ of odds 1.15 doesn´t help anyone. And I think it´s also not point of this forum, when you´ll write some VALUE bets and reasons for it, then you will have my respect. If betting was clicking on the favorites, everyone would be rich.. think about that
-
@neilovan you made this thread completely messed up with tournament not even started, with your @1.10 picks and even football picks? Yeah, those accumulators with favorites maybe passed like 5-10 years ago, but in recent years GS tournaments became very hard to predict as many suprises comes up in 1st rounds. Some players didn´t play for more than one month. Even at 5-10 pairs combo 1 ALWAYS defeats you. Option is only cashout if you are lucky to get most of matches through.
Otherwise I think there is no bigger value in grand slam matches since odds drop very fast on good bets. This 2 weeks of new season went good for me, but I´ll start here very carefully because of the reasons I mentioned. Here are some picks. Harris should be to strong for Vukic, but he is in good form and I expect some close sets. Otte already played in AUS this year, while Tseng didn`t and has not muxh experience in mathes like this. Bagnis and Garin could go in 5 sets here, I think Bagnis could even win the match given the current form and Garin is known as ´´slow starter´´ on GS. Rune and Kwon had tough match on clay last season and I expect nothing different here. Rune had bad luck in facing Moutet twice in a row, Kwon is favourite by odds and form, but I just can´t see 3:0 win for any of them. GL.
Harris, Lloyd To Win + Total Games Over 32.5
Otte, Oscar To Win + Total Sets Under 4.5
F.Bagnis vs C.Garin Total Games: Over 36.5H.Rune vs S.Kwon Total Sets: Over 3.5 -
13 hours ago, CzechPunter said:
The bookies sure aren't giving away anything. I was looking to back Brooksby again, but 1.40 isn't something I'd be interested in honestly. He's better than Davidovich Fokina at the moment and his form is immense, but those odds are crazy.
I agree with you here, before match Brooksby: van de Zandschulp i looked at outrights, former was @19 to win tournament, Brooksby wasn˝t even on the list. Now I´m looking at the same table and Brooksby is 3.80 to win?! Sinner on example is 1st with 2.90. Crazy
@carina007 I played on Cilic in last round, where odds were great to take. In 1st set against Paul he had many troubles and it could go either way. In 2nd he showed some better game, but Paul is poor server.. I expected maybe even easier win from Cilic, he makes stupid mistakes where he got the point already won, and this could cost him against better players. Now he is only @1.44, he should win but also over games are likely to happen here.
-
Friiitz
what a match again.. didn´t have balls to play him just because Zverev f.. me up few times, when he was big favorite and I was against him. HC line 4.5 seemed too low if you look at Zverev win odds - 1.15-1.20. In match against Monfils he looked very good, unfortonately I just missed MP from Zverev, but otherwise he hardly could play better. Now he´s 1.53 against Basilasvili, no value I think..
-
This Indian Wells results are strange, I´ll rather wait for next weeks when indoor hard CH continues.. where we can find better value bets
just one for today.
Melzer - Tirante 1 @2.22 with Marathonbet
Tirante won challenger in Ambato, where he beat Austrian too. Last week Melzer got revenge by easy win (6:4 6:2). Tirante had problems in 2:1 win against Seyboth Wild in 1st round here in Santiago and it looks like he dropped in form a little bit. This week they play on same courts, so this should be advantage for Melzer. In 1st round he won against Jarry in close match. In may he returned after 2 year break from tennis and now he shows again, how good player he is. Odds should be at least 1.75 on Melzer.
-
2 hours ago, darko08 said:
I think you missed this part, my friend:
"Moreover, when Azarenka was leading the 2nd set (5-2), Sasnovich held her serve comfortably (to 15) in the next game, and then she broke Azarenka in the first chance she had (to 30) in the next game. In other words, Azarenka was never even close to win neither the 8th game (5-3) nor the 9th game (5-4). With that on mind, it's really, really unfair to say that it could easily have been 6-2".
I repeat, regardless of all the wasted opportunities from Sasnovich before the 5-2, you can't say that she was lucky to end that 2nd set 6-4, cause Azarenka was never even close from winning the 5-3 nor the 5-4. Sasnovich held her serve to 15 in the 8th game (5-3) and then she broke Azarenka to 30 in the next game (5-4). What is so difficult to understand...? In case Sasnovich would have faced BPs on that 8th game or Azarenka had MPs on that 9th game then I would say: "Yeah. It could have been 5-2 or 5-3, but that was not the case. So, the +5.5 line was won deservedly. Break Points converted: Sasnovich 3-8 (5 BPs wasted), Azarenka 6-9 (3 BPs wasted). So, you're also wrong at saying that Azarenka wasted many chances. Sasnovich wasted more.
I don't care about the Pegula match. I'm talking about the bets I posted myself. I know Sasnovich was far from winning that match, I'm talking about the GH and your comment about how lucky was Sasnovich to lose that 2nd set 6-4 and not 6-2.
By the way. You liked Khachanov (-1.5 Sets) and Karatsev. Khachanov has lost in 2 sets and Karatsev only has won 4 games in the entire match. Are you going to make a review on those matches, too? I bet you won't. It's really easy to make these kind of posts once the match is over. I have never done that in my entire life. Sometimes I have made posts telling why I did not like a bet, but I always have done that before the match started, never when it was finished. It's not well seen, mate. Have you ever received a post commenting that your bet was not good after the match was over? I don't think so.
Maaan, looks like you have too much time to stick in EVERY word I comment. I just commented Punter's pick of Azarenka:Pegula match, and at the end maybe my comments and alerts helped somebody to change the pick. Because my comment was BEFORE match and it was HELPFUL. Why do you even bother if I didn't say a word about you? Read it and go on..
I often place my bets literraly in last minute, because I just don't have enough time. So also my picks and comments often come late. But to analyse matches and picks is crucial for me to see where I did it wrong, exclude luck here.
Sorry to like posts here ? seemed like a good pick, I also like yours so I don't see any problem here.. Peace.
-
10 hours ago, darko08 said:
I forgot about this part.
It's unfair to say that the 2nd set could "easily" have been 6-2. Let me explain why. First of all, Azarenka did not have a single comfortable service game on that set. She held her serve 3 times and she lost it 2 times. The 3 times she held her serve, she had to face a BP in one game and there were Deuces in the other 2 games. As you can see, she did not have a single comfortable service game.
Sasnovich held her serve 2 times and she lost it 3 times. The 2 times she held her serve she did comfortably (there were neither Break Points nor Deuces). In relation to the 3 service games she lost, there were Deuces in 2 of them. Conclusion: unlike Vika, Sasnovich had at least 2 comfortable service games. That's why I said it was not fair to say that it could easily have been 6-2. Moreover, when Azarenka was leading the 2nd set (5-2), Sasnovich held her serve comfortably (to 15) in the next game, and then she broke Azarenka in the first chance she had (to 30) in the next game. In other words, Azarenka was never even close to win neither the 8th game (5-3) nor the 9th game (5-4). With that on mind, it's really, really unfair to say that it could easily have been 6-2.
Azarenka did not play well against Kvitova, trust me. That match was horrible. Both players did a lot of errors and served really bad. Kvitova at least had an "excuse", as she had physical problems. At the beginning of the 1st set she received medical treatment on her thigh. After that, Kvitova was forced to play much more aggressive and that led her to do more errors. Imagine how bad was Azarenka, that she struggled to beat an injured Kvitova. I don't understand what are you trying to say with that. You have said that Azarenka played well against Sasnovich, but what that has to do with her previous matches?
Azarenka:Pegula 6:4 6:2
as you can see my doubts were on point obviously.. I comment only what I see by myself, Sasnovich was very far from winning the match, no need for you to "analyse" every point of the match. In 1st set Azarenka gifted her 2 or 3 points at 5:2, so she wouldn't even come to BP in that game. In 2nd set she gave up many chances again, so it's luck that she even covered HC. I don't know how she played against Kvitova, but it looks that even Svitolina was awful against Pegula.
-
2 minutes ago, darko08 said:
Yep, the reason why Sasnovich lost that match was her poor serve. That's unquestionable. The problem was that she did not serve bad in her previous matches here... So, that was something I wasn't expecting when I placed the bets. Just take a look at her serve stats against Halep. She played with a 82% of 1st serves. She won the 63% of points with 1st serve, and the 58% of points with 2nd serve. If I see a player doing something well in 3 straight matches I have to assume that she will do the same in her next game.
I agree with your view, but when you say that it easily could have been a 6-2, 6-3 you are forgetting about all the opportunities that Sasnovich wasted to break Vika's serve, and they were not few. Sasnovich wasted more break points than Vika, but there were also a lot of Deuces in Vika's service games, that she managed to save. That was also a big difference between them, Vika just played better the crucial points. In my case, the games handicap bet it's been won cause I took the +5.5 line, but I lost the other 2, so it was a bad choice anyway.
That is true, I also take bet on players that have high 2nd serve points won, and as I saw later.. this was second worse 2nd serve points won in last 50 matches for Sasnovich! Yeah it doesn´t mean much if you are close in every game but you lose it unfortunately.. after 1st set I didn´t have much hope to win bet, void at least. Saw some of Pegula-Svitolina highlights, Pegula really looked reliable.
-
7 hours ago, CzechPunter said:
Jessica Pegula to beat Victoria Azarenka at 1.81 with Pinnacle
It was a push on the Sasnovich handicap, but I'm happy to oppose Azarenka again. Pegula has looked much better than her so far in the tournament and even this year. And she has a serve, unlike Sasnovich.
Took the bet on Sasnovich from you 2 guys and I have to comment now since I´m more in ATP and feeling about bet was good
I watched first set. What Azarenka showed was pretty good and way different than you commented her previous match. Fortunatelly match ended with void bet, but it could easily be 6:2 6:3 and way from HC line.. what I also noticed like you mentioned, Sasnovich serve was very bad and she lost most of points because of it, in rallies she was even with Azarenka or sometimes even better.
Both H2H matches with Pegula were close, but Pegula looks excellent from statistic side of all matches here.. well, I might be in that bet with you again
good luck!
- darko08 and CzechPunter
-
2
-
Sinner - Krajinovic; Krajinovic +4 games HC @1.65 with Marathonbet
Young Italian defends title from last year, but he didn´t convince me this time. He was behind in both sets against Duckworth, but managed to get close 2:0 win. His numbers on service games are not that high like when he´s in top form. Krajinovic had 2 great matches here, yesterday he lost set against Majchrzak, but still showed good performance in 3rd set. He had some very good results on hard indoor in last years and I think he has chances today to at least cover HC.
Vesely - Laaksonen 1 @2.08 with WWin
Both players got some big wins this week and probably winner of this match will take the title in Orleans. As in Sofia court is fast here and this is advantage for tall Czech. Yesterday he beat Gasquet, he serves many aces and ends points quickly. Laaksonen will not get many BP I suppose and for me he is not favorite. 2 years back they played in simillar match on CH in France and Vesely got an easy win. He can repeat this today if his performance stays on the same level-
-
Majchrzak - Wolf over 22.5 games @1.78 with WWin
I predict close match here. Majchrzak is often on my over picks and rarely dissapoints. He has good serve (10 aces in 1st round) and poor return game against players of same game plan. I don´t know Wolf´s game at all, but he had some good matches this summer against Tiafoe, Isner, Nakashima and I wouldn´t underestimate him, against Istomin he won 92% 1st serves.
Gaston - Bemelmans; Bemelmans over 9.5 games @1.75 with WWin
French is big favorite in this match with @1.30, he beat Kopriva who played only on clay for last 5 months. Also Gaston came here straight from clay and his game is optimal for clay courts, his record on hard is nothing special. I disagree with bookies, since Bemelmans played some good matches in last 2 years when he was underdog and he is better players than ranking shows at the moment. He served 12 aces against de Jong and if he will hold this level, Gaston will have troubles beating him.
- yossa6133, darko08 and CzechPunter
-
3
-
8 hours ago, Hiro said:
Marcos Giron to beat Facundo Bagnis at 1.29 with Pinnacle
Arthur Rinderknech - Gilles Simon over 21 games at 1.70 with Pinnacle
M. Giron - F. Bagnis
Marcos Giron is a 27 years old player, he only has records from outside hard court, but not much. In 2019 he won Houston and also Orlando. He had a great performance at the Australian Open, he sqeezed Alex Zverev, but couldn't beat him. He's a fast and quick, he can catch difficult balls. He mostly hits backhand strokes, he tries to exhaust his opponents, and he doesn't miss a single oppurtunity. Giron isn't known for his big serves, rather for his preserving game and for how quick he is.
Bagnis is a 31 years old argentinian clay swag, he only feels comfortable on this type of court. He won 11 CH-tournaments, but he hasn't got any ATP wins. Earlier this year he got himself into a semi-final in Cordoba, where he lost against Ramos Vinolas. This game should be very smooth for Giron.
A. Rinderknech - Gil. Simon
Rinderknech wasn't a serius player until 2019. Until the age of 24 he only got wins in ITF-tournaments, nowhere else, which means he was under the middle-class in tennis. But in 2020 and 2021 he went trough a big transformation, when he was 26. He won three CH-tournaments, Both of them in inside hard court. He was a pretty good server, now a better player. This year he started to show great performances on clay court. In Gstaad he played a quarter-final, in Bastaad a quarter final too, he beat Bautista-Agut, Millman and Delbonis. The form's not bad, he went trough a transformation, but after all of that, he is still a little below the middle-class player.
Gilles Simon is a great player, in his best years he was on the list of theTOP10 players. He's a universal tennis player, he won ATP-tournaments both of clay and hard courts. He has 14 ATP and 6 CH-tournament wins. But Simon's 36 years old, and ages are a huge handicap on clay court. Simon's a higher category player, and Rinderknech won't easily beat him(if he even beats Simon), and this shouldn't be a very smooth match. The pontency is in the number of games.
Don´t forget this is pre-grand slam tournament, where some players will save their power for US Open.. so 1st round is just guessing, you will see who means seriously after 2 or 3 matches. GIron has very low odds, if you are sure than take him with some HC. Second bet.. in my opinion this goes in over only if there will be 3 sets. Rinderknech is miles above Simon this year, if his serve will work Simon has no chances. Simon can only count on bad day form and many UE from Rinderknech, also thight sets are not very likely between that kinf of player profiles. Good luck.
- four-leaf and CzechPunter
-
2
-
Challenger Lexington: Escobedo - King 2 @3.64 with Marathonbet
Darian King made return after 1 year without tennis in February. He didn't have much success till this tournament, where he obviously found form with quality that he definetly has. He was already 106. on ATP rankings 4 years ago. Here he won against very good Cressy in last round, he was also big underdog in another match. While I expected much lower odds on him, this is a must try for me. Escobedo didn't show much this year, his last match against Sid Subervi was very average on his serve, King could use it by easier hold of his service games. Good luck.
-
Period after Wimbledon is actually very sucessfull for me, but as I played mostly combos and some lower odds didn´t post here lately much. As I also see, most people post/comment just when there is GS, but don´t even know players outside top 100. Which is sad for serious bettors, since it´s easier to find some value as you are familiar from all tournaments from GS down to challengers. And as I learned in previous month, grand slams are no ´´safer´´ option to bet as they were like some years ago. Here is one tip for today.
Zverev - Chardy; Chardy +4.5 games @2.04 with WWinChardy has an excellent tournament here. He managed to win against Barrios, Karatsev and yesterday Broady, who has good season. Zverev had only 2BP against Basilashvili, but used them both to get close win. Chardy fired 16 aces per match, which will be tough even for Zverev if he doesn´t feel good on return. As we see from H2H matches, no match was easy for the German and I expect Chardy to cover HC line.
-
9 hours ago, CzechPunter said:
I saw plenty of his matches and I remember him playing well even indoors a couple of times. He's ageing, though, and the last few times I've seen him, he was poor. Interesting stats, though, thanks for bringing that up!
this is true, well for now he somehow stays on some level. it's good to see we both won ?
-
14 hours ago, CzechPunter said:
Emilio Nava to beat Matteo Viola at 1.60 with Pinnacle
I liked Viola back in the day, but he's going downhill, while Nava is a decent prospect. Not too exciting, but he played an excellent match against Maden and the faster conditions should suit him way more than Viola. The Italian feels at home on clay, as you'd expect, and he's been struggling to get his season off the ground. Nava's done much on hard courts in 2021 in any case and I expect that trend to continue here.
I wouldn´t expect Viola feels at home on clay at all, but anyway I checked the data. Just not to be ´´smartass´´ and then be wrong at the end. As you can see below, Viola has better win ratio on hard (51%) than on clay (42%).
Matches (122-119) > Time Span: Career; Surface: Hard; Level: All ATP, Qualifying, Challengers, CH Qualies
Matches (106-144) > Time Span: Career; Surface: Clay; Level: All ATP, Qualifying, Challengers, CH Qualies
As I watched his match also in Umag few years back, I can say he has bad defence, he relys on his strong serve mostly and ends up points after few shots. This is the only match caught in my eyes today, before I checked forum hehe
Viola had some hard matches in last weeks, so I think he can keep it close, and line is pretty low.
over 21.5 games @1.77 with WWin
Wimbledon 2022
in Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
Posted
Kukushkin - Brooksby 1 @3.10 with Wwin
Brooksby showed very bad games in last months, also on grass what is strange if you look at his good run in Newport last summer. Kukushkin's best years are over, but he still can show good tennis on fast courts and win at some very high odds. I think he is worth a shot here, he successfully made it through qualies and is ready to take advantage of Brooksby's bad recent form.
Goffin - Albot over 37.5 games @1.77 with Wwin
Albot made nice run on grass this year, while Goffin played only 1 match on grass. H2H is 4:0, but 3/4 ended with Albot taking a set with nice number of TB. I expect something like that also tomorrow, line is set pretty low. Goffin is not in form like he wanted before Wimbledon. 3:1 or 3:2 for Goffin.
Sock - Zapata Miralles over 38.5 games @1.75 with Wwin
Another underdog who caught my eye is Zapata Miralles, who gave a nice fight here in Wimbledon last year against Garin. Good all round player, who knows to play on all surfaces. Now he's through qualies again, ready to face Sock. He took smo nice wins at start of the grass season and deserves to be favourite. He also had to made it through qualies, but to be honest both players had very average opponents here. Sock is making a return to ATP top 100, but he has weak points and is not a player he was few years ago. I expect close sets and Spaniard takes at least one.