Jump to content
** November Poker League Result : 1st ian309, 2nd juanmoment, 3rd McG **
** Football Tipster Competition Result : 1st Soi Bongkot, 2nd fischer21, 3rd chillymonster, 4th Pempi, 5th patriciamarc **
** October Naps Competition Result: 1st sirspread, 2nd kenisbusy, 3rd Artie77, 4th Mick33. KO Cup Winner: The Equaliser, Most Winners: CS333 **


Regular Members
  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. oh look, it’s the same abusive, ignorant, small minded nonsense, different tournament. I stopped posting my thoughts on here because of the attacks at Sabalenka for being “fat”, the non-stop “Barty is overrated”, “Barty can’t serve” bs, and the abuse hurled at players because they lost a match YOU lost money betting on. grow up, grow a brain. sick of seeing this crap. (GL to Czech and the intelligent people that post regularly on here x)
  2. It's tough. We look at their H2Hs, and recent performances stick in our minds (KP's 6-0 6-0 double-bagel defeat at Rome for one). I did also think Sabalenka would win this one, albeit in a closer match. Sabalenka served well for most of the match and did actually save 8/10 BPs, but otherwise looked stuck for answers vs. Pliskova's serve. She just couldn't return the ball. KP was calmness personified, and didn't make costly errors. It could and perhaps should have been 2-0 Pliskova though, which the number of chances to break that she had. Sabalenka created just one break point across the 3 sets! The problem with comparing the ''Legends'' of women's tennis to today's top 10 crop is that you're thinking of them in their absolute prime, vs. current players who aren't necessarily in their prime right now. Coco Gauff has a very, very high ceiling, as does Iga Swiatek. They're 17 and 20 respectively. Barty is an incredible player and is only 25. Osaka (23) and Halep are great players, but are not currently at their best for obvious reasons. imo today the overall skill level is a lot more evened out across the top 20-30 players than 15+ years ago, meaning that we do tend to see a lot of different players running deep in Grand Slams/winning silverware. There's no one player in the women's game who's absolutely crushing and winning 3-4 grand slams each year like Serena, Venus, Graff, Seles, Martina etc once did. Maybe in a few years someone will emerge and be that crusher, but who knows.
  3. some (all) of your takes are genuinely horrific. she's the world number one for a reason. Luck didn't get her there. Graft did, and is why she'll be a multiple GS winner before long. I suppose she got lucky today too?
  4. ''Serve not particularly good?'' Who are you even comparing her too, Berrettini? Sampras? Serena? 8 aces today (to Kerber's zero) and a 1st points won of 88%. I watched both matches live (at center court) today. Ash deservedly won, by playing an outstanding all-round game. Kerber played well also btw, but Barty was just too good for too much of the match. Kerber had to work sooo hard to win points off Ash. Sabalenka on the other hand... has a very big serve, as you mentioned. That's kind of it though. She can't control a rally. She doesn't move well, and today she got massively outplayed, and didn't have an answer. Why? Because her game is built around keeping points as short as possible. When a point goes over 3 shots she can't really compete because she either over-hits, or the ball gets smashed into the net. it's fair to also say, this is as good as I've ever seen Karolina Pliskova play.
  5. Isn't Linette quite prone to losing matches from winning positions? Cirstea, Jabeur, Kvitova all spring to mind in past couple of months. Anyway lets all sit back and enjoy the tennis, as Viktorija Golubic somehow wins Wimbledon.
  6. ah, yes, a similar level of player; British #10, completely green, and an accomplished Czech multiple grand slam winner. Was it the win over Cirstea or the win over Voudrosova that made her a title contender?
  7. Isner isn't very good at tennis. He is however very good at hitting a ball very hard from serve. Nishioka outplayed him for most of the match, and fully deserved to win. Seems like a cool guy also.
  8. I've taken Badosa and Samsonova at very long odds.
  9. I have and he wasn't great in the grass warm up tourneys. He servebots sets but so many errors, vs. obscure opponents.
  10. Thanks, yeah wasn't aware of that. Odds make sense. Swerve!
  11. Side note: does anyone see value in backing Fritz (2.62) vs. Nakashima? Fritz hasn't played any of the grass warm-up tournaments. Nakashima has, but is still super young, and this is his first Wimbledon main draw, and he's mostly a hard court guy.
  12. Mikael Ymer to beat Jo-Wilfried Tsonga at 1.95 with William Hill Someone posted a little while ago how bad Tsonga has been since returning from injury, and in particular against Gerasimov (his only grass match since 2019). Ymer has played at a decent level recently, defeating Monfils and Carballes Baena at the French Open - before losing 3-0 to Sinner. Ymer will have a big fitness edge, and the confidence that comes from actually winning matches. Tsonga on the other hand has won 1 match since the end of 2019. In 2021 his win:loss is 1:6. He has won a total of 3/17 sets played.
  13. somewhat surprising that no-one nailed the Krejcikova vs. Pavlyuchenkova final pre-tournament really.
  • Create New...