vvararu

Another big surprise was Bautista-Agut’s loss, with @13 ?

Another big surprise was Bautista-Agut’s loss, with @13 ?

Thanks @darko08
You are not being disrespectful and I appreciate your feedback.
Indeed, Goffin, Lopez and Bencic are not shining lately. My reasoning for all of them was that they still have the class and, I hope, motivation.

@darko08 agree. Didn't observe 

Kanepi was on a 11 winning strike as well so, no big surprise 

I expect Seyboth Wild to recollect his clay abilities and win over Giustino, who is rather mediocre on clay @1.77 Unibet

Thiem seems extremely uninterested in today's game so far :))))

Rublev did not pass the world-class test

I’m going to go countercurrent of the forum . I think Nadal will win easilly the match against Rublev. 
Rublev is good player , I had win a lot of match this season indoor , but I didn’t play against top 10 ( just Thiem , Vienne) . Pospisil, Humbert, Sinner , Sonogo , Anderson , Albot ... ok , but today it’s Nadal , and it’s the Master ! 
I must admit that Nadal was not good recently, but he will solve the problem for win matchs . I’m sure

The rules should be improved and players payed for each round only if they win that round. So many disappointments with "big" players going and losing in the first round only to mark their presence, take the money and go home. People are watching them (and probably bet on them) wanting to see their good performance and, instead, they see that attitude. 

The rules should be improved and players payed for each round only if they win that round. So many disappointments with "big" players going and losing in the first round only to mark their presence, take the money and go home. People are watching them (and probably bet on them) wanting to see their good performance and, instead, they see that attitude. 

The rules should be improved and players payed for each round only if they win that round. So many disappointments with "big" players going and losing in the first round only to mark their presence, take the money and go home. People are watching them (and probably bet on them) wanting to see their good performance and, instead, they see that attitude. 

Stan is a strange man but he is my soul player (which is bad in betting)  Many times I bet on him against worse players and he lost. When he is playing against very good players (having odds 4.5), of course i am afraid to bet on him

Agree. I watched Gombos - Goffin. Gombos played "nothing special". PCB should take it easily.

Yes. You add/subtract the handicap from the final count of games/sets.
Ex 1: Lopez +5.5 games
Final result was: 4-6, 7-6, 6-4. Rafa games: 4+7+6 = 17. Lopez games: 6+6+4 = 16.
Result after handicap +5.5 on Lopez: Rafa games = 17. Lopez games 21.5. 
Because the bet was on Lopez and he's got more games after the final math, the bet won.
 
Ex: 2 Nadal -3.5 games
Final result was: 4-6, 7-6, 6-4. Rafa games: 4+7+6 = 17. Lopez games: 6+6+4 = 16.
Result after handicap -3.5 on Nadal: Rafa games = 13.5. Lopez games 16. 
Because the bet was on Nadal and he's got less games after the final math, the best lost.
 
The same is with sets handicap.

Yes. You add/subtract the handicap from the final count of games/sets.
Ex 1: Lopez +5.5 games
Final result was: 4-6, 7-6, 6-4. Rafa games: 4+7+6 = 17. Lopez games: 6+6+4 = 16.
Result after handicap +5.5 on Lopez: Rafa games = 17. Lopez games 21.5. 
Because the bet was on Lopez and he's got more games after the final math, the bet won.
 
Ex: 2 Nadal -3.5 games
Final result was: 4-6, 7-6, 6-4. Rafa games: 4+7+6 = 17. Lopez games: 6+6+4 = 16.
Result after handicap -3.5 on Nadal: Rafa games = 13.5. Lopez games 16. 
Because the bet was on Nadal and he's got less games after the final math, the best lost.
 
The same is with sets handicap.

Wawrinka to beat Paul @1.43 unibet
If the man remains motivated, and he usually is in such level competitions, he should take this easy or hard. Yes, Paul had his glory moments - win Zverev in Acapulco, Dimitrov at AO 2020 - but those happen very rare. I predict 2:0 here.

Just an insight Sandgren ran in the snow in Kazakstan without tshirt as a punsihment after losing his match. So he may be motivated.

No, it can not. Krajinovic has no relation to ATP Nitto Finals. And, I would say, his loss is shocking only if you look at the odds. Otherwise, he was unstable in last games, plus Lopez is pretty good on hard. 

No, it can not. Krajinovic has no relation to ATP Nitto Finals. And, I would say, his loss is shocking only if you look at the odds. Otherwise, he was unstable in last games, plus Lopez is pretty good on hard. 

Expecting Wawrinka to show some of his quality and beat Evans. Of course, Evans is pretty good on hard, however there is a difference in class between them and, being an ATP 1000 event, there should not be any motivation issues for Stan. @1.50 unibet
 
P.S. It’s 4:0 for Wawrinka in there H2H so Stan should know how to deal with Evans

Cameron Norrie to beat Emil Ruusuvuori at 2.00 with local
The odds are starting to get released in this range and I don't see why Norrie should be the underdog. He looked very good in Russia last week and Ruusuvuori hasn't had a good win for ages. He is a bit more adapted, but, apart from that, he should be the worse player. At evens, I'm happy to back Norrie in any case, this is the part of the season he was waiting for.

Edmund is just incredible :(((
Had 0:40 (3 breakpoint chances in first game of Nishioka) and 0:40 in the last game of Nishioka and still succeeded to lose 1st set, being broken once.

Meanwhile Wawrinka looks pretty humble against Gaston
40 unforced errors in 3 sets...
At 1.04 before-match odds :))

Musetti - Nishikori 
I don't buy the odds offered by bookers. 1.79 for Musetti against 2.02 for Nishikori....
Yes, the guy won against Mayer (didn't watch the game) and Wawrinka (who either felt bad or was not interested in that game. Other than that he played agains average players in the last months (lost some games against average players as well... Altmaier, Alcaraz).
On the other side we have Nishikori, who did not play for a long time. Lost his first clay game against Kecmanovic (winning 1 set) and than won against Ramos in Rome.
I think that Nishikori has a good trend, having a first win on clay, and has much more experience. My guess is that tomorrow the odds will inverse. 
2.02 Unibet on Nishikori.