Jump to content
** March Poker League Result : =1st Bridscott, =1st Like2Fish, 3rd avongirl **
** Cheltenham Tipster Competition Result : 1st Old codger, 2nd sirspread, 3rd Bathtime For Rupert **

MCLARKE

Administrators
  • Posts

    10,549
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    453

Posts posted by MCLARKE

  1. @Trotter replied

    Just the Racing Post and I use their standard times

    I think the 'art' in the process comes from working out allowances ...... as for race times the Post has a huge database so their times should be as good as any and as long as you use the same set of times all the time it doesn't really matter ....... it's not absolute figures that matter it's relative figures between horses !

  2. @Trotter replied

    that's true ! ...... I usually do AW when I bother with them 

    In fact I did do AW speed ratings for a good 3 or 4 years a few years ago and found it a good basis for assessing races. It's OK over the winter but during the summer horses flit between AW and Turf so you never have the full picture of how they're running from race to race. The main problem is that there is far too much racing ...... it would be a full time job to rate all races. It might be practical to do it for Irish racing where they have a lot fewer meetings

    If you do fancy a crack at compiling your own ratings it might be an idea to have a separate thread where all the speed ratings posts can be grouped together ..... it's a topic that crops up every now and then but the posts get lost in the daily threads

  3. This is the first post that was posted in the daily chat by @Trotter

     

    I don't think there's any way I'm going to keep this up but thought I'd do some speed figures for todays Curragh meeting. I'd like to do ratings for every meeting that includes a Group race but I don't imagine I will .... It'll soon become a chore that I give up on

    Here's the ratings of todays winners - highest to lowest

    Procrastinate 102, 
    Real Force 101,
    Brilliant 98,
    Money Dancer 93,
    Arizona Blaze (2) 90,
    Chazzesmee 90,
    Merisi Diamond 88,
    Global Energy 83

    This was run on Heavy ground and my going allowance was 88 ...... so the bulk of all the above figures is going allowance

    eg Procrastinate ran a figure of 14 then got his 88 going allowance added on

    note that my ratings are in lengths per mile ...... so Procrastinate would be 18 lengths per mile quicker than Global Energy ....... in a mile race I'd expect him to beat him by 18 lengths

  4. 30 minutes ago, Zilzalian said:

    Explain the reasoning behind an ew fourfold and in particular the place aspect at prices 5/1, 15/8, 13/8 & 9/4. I really am genuinely curious. @harry_rag if these prices were on football how would you treat them? @MCLARKE you are into your maths, what are your thoughts are there any merits in your view?

    There could be some logic if there are extra places available.

    However the benefits are better the higher the odds so the each way element will dilute the winnings / increase the losses.

  5. On 3/16/2024 at 11:31 PM, The Equaliser said:

    I do write them up quite regularly but tend to just quote YTD figures.  Since you ask I have updated my figures to include today's bets.  Lucky 15's YTD  = -46.66; Racing Chat (RC) YTD including L15's = -52.64 Points.

    I was a bit annoyed with myself today for not backing my Nap selection Slipaway independently of the L15

    Surely you can't retire, who will check up on me regularly 🤣

    To be fair to @The Equaliserhe is one of the few that do seem to keep accurate records !

×
×
  • Create New...